[fba/problembehavior/headpage.htm]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgments
Introduction
IDEA Rights and Requirements
IEP Team Roles and Responsibilities
Why a Functional Assessment of Behavior is Important
Conducting a Functional
Behavioral Assessment
Identifying the Problem Behavior
Possible Alternative Assessment Strategies
Techniques for Conducting the Functional Behavioral Assessment
Indirect Assessment
Direct Assessment
Data Analysis
Hypothesis Statement
Individuals Assessing Behavior
Behavior Intervention Plans
Addressing Skill Deficits
Addressing Performance Deficits
Addressing Both Skill and
Performance Deficits
Modifying the Learning Environment
Providing Supports
Evaluating the Behavior Intervention Plan
Summary
Resources
Appendix A
Appendix B

INDIVIDUALS ASSESSING BEHAVIOR

Persons responsible for conducting the functional behavioral assessment will vary from state to state and possibly from district to district. Some behavioral assessment procedures, such as standardized tests, may require an individual with specific training (e.g., behavior specialist or school psychologist). With specialized training, experience, and support, however, many components of the assessment can be conducted by other individuals, such as special or general education teachers, counselors, and administrators. Again, it is important to note that interventions should not be based upon one assessment measure, alone, or upon data collected by only one observer.

BEHAVIOR INTERVENTION PLANS

After collecting data on a student’s behavior, and after developing a hypothesis of the likely function of that behavior, a team develops (or revises) the student’s behavior intervention plan or strategies in the IEP.  These may include positive strategies, program or curricular modifications, and supplementary aids and supports required to address the disruptive behaviors in question. It is helpful to use the data collected during the functional behavioral assessment to develop the plan and to determine the discrepancy between the child’s actual and expected behavior.

The input of the general education teacher, as appropriate (i.e., if the student is, or may be participating in the regular education environment), is especially crucial at this point. He or she will be able to relay to the team not only his or her behavioral expectations, but also valuable information about how the existing classroom environment and/or general education curriculum can be modified to support the student.

Intervention plans and strategies emphasizing skills students need in order to behave in a more appropriate manner, or plans providing motivation to conform to required standards, will be more effective than plans that simply serve to control behavior. Interventions based upon control often fail to generalize (i.e., continue to be used for long periods of time, in many settings, and in a variety of situations) — and many times they serve only to suppress behavior — resulting in a child manifesting unaddressed needs in alternative, inappropriate ways. Positive plans for behavioral intervention, on the other hand, will address both the source of the problem and the problem itself.

IEP teams may want to consider the following techniques when designing behavior intervention plans, strategies, and supports:

Manipulate the antecedents and/or consequences of the behavior;
Teach more acceptable replacement behaviors that serve the same function as the inappropriate behavior;
Implement changes in curriculum and instructional strategies; and
Modify the physical environment.

The following section describes some ideas IEP teams may consider when developing behavior intervention plans and strategies.

Previous Section - Next Section - Back to Main Page