Prevention Strategies That Work

Project SUCCESS

Contact

Marjorie Montague
University of Miami
Coral Gables, FL
(305)284-2891
email: mmontague@aol.com 

 

Marjorie Montague, James McKinney, and Anne Hocutt direct Project SUCCESS (grant number: H237F40022). Project SUCCESS is a comprehensive approach that considers the following classroom entry points for prevention:

* Cross-age peer tutoring for improving reading skills.
* Direct assistance to classroom teachers on behavioral management techniques.
* Training on teaching social skills.

Implementation of the Intervention

The comprehensive intervention is classroom-based. Therefore, administrators must solicit the interest of their faculty before taking any further steps.

The categories of costs associated with introducing and sustaining this practice are:

* Release time (substitutes) for teacher training, planning, and collaboration.
* Materials (e.g., social skills program).
* Cost of project consultants for training and technical assistance.

Introducing the Intervention

Administrators introduce the intervention to volunteer teachers. The teachers are given release time for training and technical assistance in the classroom. Project SUCCESS staff found that it helps to begin with direct assistance to classroom teachers before transitioning to technical assistance on an as-needed basis.

Supporting Implementation

Ongoing support at the school level from administrators and commitment of teachers are necessary. Administrators must provide time for teachers to meet and review their progress and make modifications (e.g., for a grade-level social skills program). Reinforcement and recognition for teachers who participate, maintain the program, and engage others in the program are also important. Ongoing training and consultation are key to addressing the needs of the teachers and the children.

Project staff members discovered several barriers to success. These were:

* In some cases, teachers needed more direct assistance in the classroom prior to training and technical assistance. In schools where there are significant student needs, administrators will need to build in sufficient start-up time for direct assistance.

* The project cannot be undertaken without release time or planning time for the project activities. Teachers need support and release time in addition to training to implement new strategies and programs.

* Participation should be an option. Otherwise, resistant teachers may sabotage efforts.

* Some faculty do not believe in prevention. Thus, the administrator must support prevention as a goal and as a value.  

Enhancements

Children at risk for developing serious emotional disturbance typically have multiple and complex learning, behavioral, and emotional needs. These children and their families need integrated service delivery that focuses on educational and mental health services. Families need access to agencies that will provide social services and support. Schools can provide linkages to social service and health agencies in what is called a full service school model. Project SUCCESS included case management for the families of children who were high-risk. Project staff had an agreement with a mental health agency, which provides on-site assistance at these full-service schools to fund a case manager for the project.

About Project Field Sites

Two full-service elementary schools were studied at the Miami site, Fienberg/Fisher and Miami Park.

Fienberg/Fisher had more than 1,000 students from 14 countries in Pre-K-6, and was highly multicultural. Students spoke 16 languages. Students were 74% Hispanic, 14% Black/non-Hispanic, 10% white/non-Hispanic, and 2% Asian or American Indian; faculty are 71% Hispanic, 17% white/non-Hispanic, 13% Black/non-Hispanic, and 1% Asian or American Indian. Three percent of students in mainstream classes had disabilities, while students with learning and emotional disabilities were in a separate program in the school. 54% were in Chapter One, 38% were in the English as a Second Language program, and 91% of the students received a free or reduced-price lunch. There was a 48% mobility rate at this school.

Miami Park had more than 900 students, 68% of whom were Black (non-Hispanic), 29% Hispanic, and 3% white (non-Hispanic); 18.1% of the students had disabilities, and the largest category of disability was emotionally handicapped (4.4% of the students); 13% of the student body was considered to be "at risk." Free and reduced-price lunches were given to 91% of the students. There was a 36% mobility rate at this school.

Effectiveness

Given the target students' moderate to high risk status coupled with unusually serious behavior problems, the data indicate that the project has prevented inappropriate referrals for special education and potential identification as serious emotional disturbance.

Findings from Project SUCCESS suggest the following:

* In low social-economic status, culturally diverse elementary schools, approximately 16% of students in kindergarten and first grade will be at moderate or high risk for developing SED.

* These at-risk students will be more rejected by their teachers than other students.

* These at-risk students will be less academically engaged than other students.

* General education classroom teachers make few, if any, accommodations to meet the learning and behavioral needs of these students.

* Cross-age peer tutoring is an effective strategy for improving reading performance of these at-risk students.

* Most teachers are receptive to staff development for training in social skills instruction and positive behavioral support systems.

* Interagency collaboration is difficult to implement without systematic and ongoing planning that includes key stakeholders.  

Project Offerings

Project SUCCESS staff work directly with classroom teachers to provide support in the classroom (grades 1-4). Project SUCCESS also works with schools to establish full service schools. One article is available from the project:

* Lago-Delello, E. (1998). Classroom dynamics and the development of serious emotional disturbance. Exceptional Children, 64, 479-492.

* McKinney, J.D., Montague, M., & Hocutt, A.M. (1998). Systematic screening of children at risk for developing SED: Initial results from a prevention project. In C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. Friedman (Eds.), The 10th Annual Research Conference Proceedings, A System of Care for Children's Mental Health: Expanding the Knowledge Base (pp. 271-276). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Research and Training Center for Children's Mental Health.


For more information about this project, please contact Marjorie Montague.

Questions?  Comments?  E-mail crsnyder@zoo.uvm.edu

Back to the main page for Prevention Strategies

Back to the Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice

idea.gif (3308 bytes)