|
|
In the past two decades,
researchers and practitioners have developed an extensive knowledge base about children
with emotional disturbance. These intensive research efforts suggest that results for
students with emotional disturbance can be improved through interventions that are
sustained, flexible, positive, collaborative, culturally appropriate, and regularly
evaluated. These interventions should have multiple components tailored to individual
needs; they should build on the strengths of youth and their families, address academic as
well as social concerns, be implemented by trained and supported practitioners, and be
continually evaluated (Carpenter & Apter, 1988; Clarke et al., 1995; Eber, Nelson,
& Miles, 1997; Epstein, Nelson, Polsgrove, Coutinho, Cumblad, & Quinn, 1993;
Huntze, 1988; Knitzer, Steinberg, & Fleisch, 1990; McLaughlin et al., 1994; Nelson
& Rutherford, 1988; Peacock Hill Working Group, 1991; Stroul & Friedman, 1996;
Sugai, Bullis, & Cumblad, 1997). OSEP continues
to play an active role in developing and applying knowledge to improve results for young
people with emotional disturbance. OSEP-supported research projects like the National
Needs Assessment in Behavior Disorders and the NLTS have helped pinpoint problem areas in
these students development and have made significant contributions to the
development of promising approaches to early intervention and school discipline (e.g.,
Walker et al., 1995). OSEP research investments have developed tools such as functional
behavioral assessments to identify and address the needs of individual students (Horner,
1994; Umbreit & Blair, 1997; Wehby et al., 1997). OSEP has also supported
demonstration projects that build on research in childrens mental health (e.g.,
Stroul, Lourie, Goldman, & Katz-Leavy, 1992) to create flexible, results-driven,
family responsive services and comprehensive education and support systems to reduce the
need for restrictive out-of-home placements (Petr, 1994; Stroul & Friedman, 1996).
This knowledge base was influential in the development of
The National Agenda for Achieving Better Results for
Children and Youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance (U.S. Department of
Education, 1994). To create this agenda, OSEP garnered extensive input from researchers,
practitioners, and families (Smith & Coutinho, 1997) to "focus the attention of
educators, parents, advocates, and professionals from a variety of disciplines on what is
needed to be done to encourage, assist, and support our nations schools in their
efforts to improve the educational process to achieve better outcomes for children and
youth with serious emotional disturbance" (Osher, Osher, & Smith, 1994). The
agenda featured seven interdependent targets: expanding positive learning opportunities
and results, strengthening school and community capacity, valuing and addressing
diversity, collaborating with families, promoting appropriate assessment, providing
ongoing skill development and support, and creative comprehensive and collaborative
systems (U.S. Department of Education, 1994).
The National Agenda has served as the basis for State
planning and evaluation efforts such as the Serious Emotional Disturbance Network (SEDNET,
1996). It is also the foundation of Federal interagency collaboration on issues of concern
to children with emotional disturbance and their families. In a cooperative effort, the
Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice, OSERS, the Head
Start Bureau, the Childrens Bureau, CMHS, and the Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) co-sponsored an invitational conference entitled
"Making Collaboration Work for Children, Youth, Families, Schools and
Communities." This project brought together youth and their families with
researchers, practitioners, administrators, and public officials. The meeting highlighted
exemplary programs and documented the extent to which all service areas work
simultaneously to serve children and families. The conference also delineated what is
necessary to ensure effective interagency collaboration (Bullock & Gable, 1997; U.S.
Department of Education, 1996; U.S. Department of Education, 1997). In the same vein, OSEP
has joined with OJJDP and CMHS to fund collaborative research and technical assistance
efforts on educations role in systems of care and in the prevention of juvenile
delinquency.
OSERS has made the National Agenda the basis for targeting
OSEPs research to practice investments in the field of childhood and youth emotional
disturbance. OSEP currently funds projects that focus on prevention, positive approaches
to learning, cultural competence, and assessment of children with emotional disturbance.
In fiscal year 1998, the National Agenda became a Focus Area under OSEPs
Model/Demonstration priority, and three new awards were granted to support comprehensive
programs that implement services in conformance with the seven target areas of the Agenda.
OSEP continues to address the gap between research and
practice--between what is known and what is done. The Center for
Effective Collaboration and Practice, housed at the American Institutes for Research,
was created to promote a national reorientation toward fostering the development and
adjustment of children with or at risk of emotional disturbance. The Center engages in
strategic activities intended to help family members, practitioners, administrators,
researchers and policy makers collaborate effectively in the efficient production and use
of knowledge to improve results for children with or at risk of emotional disturbance. In
the summer of 1998, the Center teamed with the National Association of School
Psychologists, in a special collaborative project jointly led by the Departments of
Education and Justice and in response to President Clintons directive, to produce Early Warning--Timely Response: A Guide to Safe Schools,
which was disseminated to all American schools in the fall. The guide emphasized the
importance of child-centered and school- and community-supported prevention and
intervention approaches. |