OVERVIEW
Six Collaborative evening Parent Training Classes were provided for parents of at-risk and behaviorally disordered children and youth to address two needs: (a) parents, schools, and community agencies needed to collaborate to most effectively change child behavior; and (b) parents of difficult-to-manage children and youth lacked sufficient information, skills and support. Parents were invited to attend weekly two-hour sessions that provided training, support, and dinner (participants were also reimbursed for transportation and baby-sitting fees). The sessions were co-facilitated by school psychologists and community mental health professionals. Follow-up in home training/ support also was offered. The school psychologist was involved in the design, implementation, and evaluation of this program. Specifically, the school psychologist (a) developed the curriculum for the parent training program; (b) co-facilitated the evening parent training classes; and (c) conducted data analysis, report writing, and grant writing.
On the first and last night of classes, parents rated, on a Likert-type scale; (a) their perceptions of their childrens behavior; (b) their knowledge of strategies to change behavior; (c) the effectiveness of the strategies; and (d) their opinion of the program components. Comparing the pre- and post intervention questionnaires, the average scores on all of the questions showed positive change. Increases were reported in knowledge of behavior change strategies and effectiveness in managing childrens behavior. On the post-intervention questionnaire parents continued to rate their childrens behavior as a serious problem, with some decrease of severity. Parents reported that they would attend a follow-up series of meetings and would recommend the classes to a friend. The co-facilitators completed a qualitative questionnaire at the end of the classes. The results indicate that they (a) found the materials to be basic enough to generalize to most parents; and (b) felt that most of the parents benefited from the curriculum materials and support from the other parents and co-facilitators. All had positive comments regarding the experience and were interested in co-facilitating the classes in the future.
AGENCY TYPE: Public school
POPULATION: 100% Caucasian
| External grants |
| In-kind school district contributions |
| Teach specific social skills | |
| Prevent placement in more restrictive setting | |
| Reduce specific behavior problems | |
| Prevent exacerbation of mild adjustment difficulties | |
| Increase social problem solving skills | |
| Teach conflict resolution or mediation skills | |
| Crisis intervention | |
| Violence prevention | |
| Parental involvement | |
| Generalization of program effects | |
| Individualized goals |
FORMAT
Large group Non-classroom based Home-based COMPONENTS
Staff training Ongoing consultation with program staff Access additional resources (e.g., funding staff) REFERRAL SOURCES
Self Teacher Multidisciplinary team Mental Health Support Staff (Psychologist, Counselor, Social Worker) Outside agency Administrators ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES TO DETERMINE ELIGIBILITY
Behavioral checklists Interviews CRITERIA FOR TERMINATION
Complete specified program GENERALIZATION PROCEDURES
Teaching self-monitoring or verbal mediators Parent training Implementation by multiple facilitators/educators Booster or follow-up sessions
DATA COLLECTION TECHNIQUES
Self-report Rating scales OUTCOMES THAT ARE EVALUATED
Knowledge Attitudes/beliefs Target behaviors (parent techniques) Specific problems behaviors Reduction in risky behavior (rule-breaking) Generalization of program effects to other settings
Description of program design Program guide for implementation Curriculum Intervention techniques Evaluation procedures Evaluation results Goals and objectives Theoretical-empirical foundation Description of program model Definition of population served
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS PROGRAM INVOLVEMENT
Program design/planning 15% Program implementation 75% Program evaluation 10%
ECOLOGICAL-COLLABORATIVE MODEL (Program Participants)
School Psychologist School Administrator
PROGRAM EVALUATION
Program acceptability Program integrity Program efficacy (outcome)
LEVELS OF SERVICE PROVISION
Level I. Prevention Level II. Risk reduction Level III.Early intervention Level IV. Treatment
The program is empirically based on research regarding program efficacy, population needs, and risk and protective factors. The program's theoretical base also represents a range of perspectives.
For more information on Collaborative Evening
Parent Training Classes please contact the
following:
[footer.htm]Paula Laidig
School Psychologist
Stonebridge Elementary School
900 North Owen Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
612-351-8715 (Phone)
612-351-9345 (Fax)
laidig@aol.com
http://cecp.air.org/resources/nasp/mn.htm