[header.htm]

OVERVIEW - PROGRAM DEMOGRAPHICS - FUNDING SOURCES - PROGRAM GOALS -
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION - PROGRAM EVALUATION - WRITTEN MATERIALS AVAILABLE -
EXEMPLARY CHARACTERISTICS - CONTACT INFO

OVERVIEW

Six Collaborative evening Parent Training Classes were provided for parents of at-risk and behaviorally disordered children and youth to address two needs: (a) parents, schools, and community agencies needed to collaborate to most effectively change child behavior; and (b) parents of difficult-to-manage children and youth lacked sufficient information, skills and support. Parents were invited to attend weekly two-hour sessions that provided training, support, and dinner (participants were also reimbursed for transportation and baby-sitting fees). The sessions were co-facilitated by school psychologists and community mental health professionals. Follow-up in home training/ support also was offered. The school psychologist was involved in the design, implementation, and evaluation of this program. Specifically, the school psychologist (a) developed the curriculum for the parent training program; (b) co-facilitated the evening parent training classes; and (c) conducted data analysis, report writing, and grant writing.

On the first and last night of classes, parents rated, on a Likert-type scale; (a) their perceptions of their children’s behavior; (b) their knowledge of strategies to change behavior; (c) the effectiveness of the strategies; and (d) their opinion of the program components. Comparing the pre- and post intervention questionnaires, the average scores on all of the questions showed positive change. Increases were reported in knowledge of behavior change strategies and effectiveness in managing children’s behavior. On the post-intervention questionnaire parents continued to rate their children’s behavior as a serious problem, with some decrease of severity. Parents reported that they would attend a follow-up series of meetings and would recommend the classes to a friend. The co-facilitators completed a qualitative questionnaire at the end of the classes. The results indicate that they (a) found the materials to be basic enough to generalize to most parents; and (b) felt that most of the parents benefited from the curriculum materials and support from the other parents and co-facilitators. All had positive comments regarding the experience and were interested in co-facilitating the classes in the future.

 

top.gif (986 bytes)PROGRAM DEMOGRAPHICS

AGENCY TYPE: Public school

POPULATION:  100% Caucasian

top.gif (986 bytes)FUNDING SOURCES

External grants
In-kind school district contributions

top.gif (986 bytes)PROGRAM GOALS

Teach specific social skills
Prevent placement in more restrictive setting
Reduce specific behavior problems
Prevent exacerbation of mild adjustment difficulties
Increase social problem solving skills
Teach conflict resolution or mediation skills
Crisis intervention
Violence prevention
Parental involvement
Generalization of program effects
Individualized goals

top.gif (986 bytes)PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

FORMAT

Large group
Non-classroom based
Home-based

COMPONENTS

Staff training
Ongoing consultation with program staff
Access additional resources (e.g., funding staff)

REFERRAL SOURCES

Self
Teacher
Multidisciplinary team
Mental Health Support Staff (Psychologist, Counselor, Social Worker)
Outside agency
Administrators

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES TO DETERMINE ELIGIBILITY

Behavioral checklists
Interviews

CRITERIA FOR TERMINATION

Complete specified program

GENERALIZATION PROCEDURES

Teaching self-monitoring or verbal mediators
Parent training
Implementation by multiple facilitators/educators
Booster or follow-up sessions

top.gif (986 bytes)PROGRAM EVALUATION

DATA COLLECTION TECHNIQUES

Self-report
Rating scales

OUTCOMES THAT ARE EVALUATED

Knowledge
Attitudes/beliefs
Target behaviors (parent techniques)
Specific problems behaviors
Reduction in risky behavior (rule-breaking)
Generalization of program effects to other settings

top.gif (986 bytes)WRITTEN MATERIALS AVAILABLE

Description of program design
Program guide for implementation
Curriculum
Intervention techniques
Evaluation procedures
Evaluation results
Goals and objectives
Theoretical-empirical foundation
Description of program model
Definition of population served

top.gif (986 bytes)EXEMPLARY CHARACTERISTICS

SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST’S PROGRAM INVOLVEMENT
(How does the school psychologist allocate his/her program time?)

Program design/planning 15%
Program implementation 75%
Program evaluation 10%

ECOLOGICAL-COLLABORATIVE MODEL (Program Participants)

School Psychologist
School Administrator

PROGRAM EVALUATION

Program acceptability
Program integrity
Program efficacy (outcome)

LEVELS OF SERVICE PROVISION

Level I. Prevention
Level II. Risk reduction
Level III.Early intervention
Level IV. Treatment

The program is empirically based on research regarding program efficacy, population needs, and risk and protective factors.   The program's theoretical base also represents a range of perspectives.

 

top.gif (986 bytes)For more information on Collaborative Evening Parent Training Classes please contact the following:

Paula Laidig
School Psychologist
Stonebridge Elementary School
900 North Owen Street
Stillwater, MN 55082
612-351-8715 (Phone)
612-351-9345 (Fax)
laidig@aol.com

Return to NASP Presentations

[footer.htm]

 

http://cecp.air.org/resources/nasp/mn.htm