Introduction
There are three main components in the Check & Connect Project.
Resiliency research suggests that one of the most important factors for student success is the presence of an adult in a student's life to fuel motivation and encourage the development of life skills needed to persevere through great obstacles. Check & Connect is a model intended to tip the balance in the lives of young people with emotional and behavioral challenges by building a relationship between these students and a caring adult focused on the youth's educational success. Check & Connect strives to strengthen the bonds between the student, family, school, and other members of the community to increase the likelihood that each student has a viable support network.
Check
& Connect
Relationship Building: The Role of the Monitor
The role of the monitor is a cross between a mentor, advocate and service coordinator. One student described his monitor as "the person who says on my back about coming to school." Monitors stay with students and their families over a period of time, following them from building to building, year to year. The permanence of the monitor demonstrates to students a real and persistent commitment to school engagement, which drives home the message that staying in school is important. The monitor regularly checks students' attendance and academic performance, giving concrete feedback to the student and family about the young person's educational performance, mindful to communicate frequently with families about both good and bad news. A non-blaming approach is used to keep intervention efforts focused on resolution. While past efforts and mishaps are not overlooked, instead of searching for blame, the monitor works to create a new action plan and move forward. All these activities work to slowly earn the trust and confidence of the families, students and school staff. When students were asked how they knew they could trust their monitor, one student replied, "...because he showed up at my door step over the summer." Another student commented, "I knew I could really trust this person when I started classes at my new school, and there she was."
The monitor's job is to never give up on a student's educational attainment, nor permit the student to be distracted from the importance of school. The monitor is someone who knows the student's educational history, is familiar with the student's family background, and is available throughout the school year, summer, and into the next year. Each monitor reinforces the same message to students: A caring adult believes school is important. You can succeed, do the work, attend class, be on time, express frustration constructively, and stay in school. Monitors work to promote student's self advocacy and to avoid over dependence. Monitors help students acquire the skills and confidence needed to complete high school, using a five-step problem solving strategy, and acknowledging each step toward success. Monitors explicitly reinforce their expectation for students to finish high school.
A monitor working 40 hours per week carries a caseload of 40 to 50 students. The positions are staffed so monitors can follow students from building to building. The length of time a monitor works with a student ideally will continue for at least two years. In the best-case scenario, a monitor works with the same young person until the student has established a consistent pattern of school engagement. For students who do not attend school regularly, particularly youth for whom stability and consistency are not a typical component of daily life, the continuity provided by a monitor is reassuring and provides an informative resource for teachers and parents trying to meet the student's needs. When it is not possible to maintain the same monitor over time, the message to the student from a caring adult stays the same: you can succeed, be on time, attend classes, complete the work, express frustration in a constructive manner, and stay in school. Some students on a monitor's caseload have a strong connection with an adult in the school building; a special education case manager, hall monitor, custodian or coach. The monitor's role is not to replace established relationships, but to work with each key adult in the student's life in a process of supporting the student's engagement with school.
Effective monitors are hired for the following attitudes and abilities.
Check
& Connect
Checking: Supporting Students by Setting Educational
Goals
"Checking" refers to a continual assessment of student engagement with school. The term engagement here refers to three types of indicators, including attendance (skipping classes, absenteeism), social/behavior performance (out-of-school suspension, other disciplinary consequences such as behavior referrals, detention, in-school suspension), and academic performance (course failures, accrual of credits). Although every school gathers such information, the data are not routinely used to systematically guide drop out prevention and school engagement efforts. A student is generally considered "disengaged" from school, if he or she meets one or more of the following conditions:
Two levels of student-focused interventions are used to maximize finite resources: basic intervention, which is the same for all students and delivered at least one time per month, and intensive interventions, which are delivered more frequently and are individualized. All students received basic interventions (even if receiving intensive interventions), whereas those students who are "disengaged," as defined previously, also receive intensive interventions. Individual needs of the student and family dictate what specific intervention strategy is used. The two levels of intervention, guided by the "check" information, help the monitors to manage their time and resources more efficiently and responsively.
Check & Connect
Basic Intervention:
Strengthening Social Skills and Keeping School
a High Priority
As a sustained preventive measure, basic intervention is administered to all targeted students. Basic intervention uses minimal resources in an effort to keep education a salient issue, especially after a working relationship has been established among the monitor, student, parents, and school staff. It begins with introductions, sharing general information about the monitor's role and the Check & Connect model with the student and his or her family. The substance of basic intervention is a monthly conversation with each student. The conversation covers the student's progress in school, the relationship between school completion and the "check" indicators of engagement, the importance of staying in school, and review of problem-solving steps to resolve conflict and cope with life's challenges. For problem solving, students are guided through real and/or hypothetical problems using a five step cognitive-behavioral problem-solving strategy:
Intensive Intervention: Individualized Services for Students At Risk
Intensive interventions are targeted for "disengaged" students showing high risk in relation to any of the early warning signs of withdrawal. At least three-quarters of the students typically receive intensive intervention at any given time. Intensive interventions are tailored to the individual needs of the student and family, but can be characterized as falling into one of the following broad types: conflict resolution and coping strategies; academic support and assistance with alternate school completion routes; transition support including employment and post-secondary education, as well as recreation and community service exploration. While the intensive strategies are not unique from what other school staff may employ, the intervention is often met with less resistance from students. The long-term relationship between monitor and student may be one reason for this, but even more important, the monitor has the time to be persistent and to provide students with the information and encouragement needed to follow through on interventions and activities. Existing support services in the school and community are used as much as possible to promote the student's community participation and to minimize service duplication.
Check
& Connect
Connecting with Family
Connect procedures also involve outreach to family members. While this procedure is described separately, in practice it is intertwined with student outreach efforts. Family members are brought into the process as resources and partners. A non-blaming approach is critical. Family members are contacted either by phone or home visit, as monitors seek to share and exchange information about their child's educational progress. Parent support for learning is promoted individually, as part of intensive interventions, as well as through opportunities offered to all targeted parents regardless of their child's level of engagement with school.
Individual interventions focus on minimizing education-related barriers identified by the family (e.g., communication between caregivers and school staff) or on facilitating access to resources that directly or indirectly promote the student's connection with school (e.g., helping the parent enroll younger children in Head Start so the older sibling is not kept home to babysit). A common intensive intervention among parents of children with emotional and behavioral challenges focused on helping caregivers, typically mothers, exchange ideas about alternative discipline strategies and how to set boundaries for their adolescents.
Check & Connect
Resource Requirements Summary
Population Receiving Services from Check & Connect
Check & Connect targeted two cohorts of 9th graders receiving special
education services for a primary or secondary emotional and behavioral
disability. Students were enrolled in one of the seven traditional urban
high schools, with access to the general education curriculum (about 200
students total). Each high school served about 1,000 students. All the
target students were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control
group. Students were followed throughout the metro area over the project
period (1996-2001) regardless of the change in educational setting or enrollment
status.
| Check & Connect Staff Position Titles | Total Staff Time | Duties |
| Check & Connect Monitors | 100% FTE for every 40 students served | Direct Service to students and families, data collection for program evaluation. |
| Project Coordinator | 40% FTE | Overall project management, program staff supervision and program evaluation. |
| 1 Support Staff (personnel, payroll, etc...) | Up to 25% FTE | Data management, mileage reimbursement, and other clerical support. |
Categories of Activities
| Activity Category | Staff Hours Required | Staff Responsible |
| Program Administration, i.e. personnel, budget, payroll, reporting requirements. | 6 hours/week combined | Project Coordinator, Support Staff |
| Program Management, i.e. supervision, staff development, preserving treatment integrity | 20 hours/week combined | Project Coordinator, Monitors |
| Identifying and Targeting Students for Intervention | 2 hours/week combined | Project Coordinator, Monitors, School Staff |
| Deliver Check and Connect Intervention and maintain ongoing documentation. | 38 hours/week combined | Monitors |
| Program Evaluation | 4 hours/week | Project Coordinator, Monitors |
Resource Requirements for Start-Up
| Start-Up Duties | Staff Responsible | Time Required | Supplies Required |
| Set up budget and subcontracts if needed. | Project Coordinator, Staff | 40 hours | Computer access with appropriate software, paper, calculator, printer |
| Recruit and hire program staff. | Project Coordinator, | 64 hours | Human resources services, newspaper ad, flyers, interview protocol, copier |
| Initial in-service for new staff. | Project Coordinator, | 40 hours | In-service materials, folders, notepads. |
| Refine intervention for target sample with community input | Project Coordinator, | 40 hours | Computer access, paper, printer, letterhead |
| Generate list of potential target students (with demographic contact information) after finalizing human subjects approval. | Project Coordinator, School District Staff | 60 hours | Computer access, paper, disks, printer, letterhead. |
| Randomly select sample and collect parent permission. | Project Coordinator, Monitors | 1.5 hours per student, on average | Computer access, letterhead, stamps, brochure, phones, copier, envelopes, mileage reimbursement. |
| Connect with school staff at building level to coordinate start-up. | Project Coordinator.... Director, Monitors........ | 25 hours | Brochures, letterhead, paper, folders, copier, meeting space, food |
| Collect baseline data. | Project Coordinator, Monitors | 60 hours/ year | Paper, computer access, copier, printer. |
| Develop program brochure and initiate other dissemination efforts. | Project Coordinator, Support Staff | 40 hours | Computer access, paper, printer, transparencies. |
Resource Requirements for Continuous
Operations
| Operations Duties | Staff Responsible | Time | Supplies |
| Deliver Check and Connect Intervention. (Monitors tended to divide time thus: 50% with students, 15% with families, 20% with school staff, 15% other professionals and community workers.) | Monitors | 40 hours/week per 40 students | Student/family outreach rewards at $20.00/ student/ year, voice mail, pager, mileage reimbursement, business cards, brochures |
| Program supervision and development, including ongoing staff development. | Project Coordinator, | 12 hours / week | Voice mail, pager, mileage, reimbursement, resource directory, business cards, brochures, staff development materials, paper, copier, stamps, letterhead, computer |
| Program administration, such as budget reporting ongoing personnel and payroll | Project Coordinator, |
2 hours/week |
Computer access, paper, letterhead, stamps, phone, calculator |
| Program evaluation. | Project Coordinator,
Monitors |
6 hours/week combined | Survey instruments, letterhead, computer access, file organizers, student and teacher access, access to student records. |
DISCLAIMER. This project is supported by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). Opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the position of the U.S. Department of Education.
Contact: Mary F. Sinclair, Ph.D. Institute of Community Integration, University of Minnesota, 150 Pillsbury Drive SE, 111 Pattee Hall, Minneapolis, MN 55455 sincl001@tc.umn.edu
Project Staff: Sandra Christenson,
Carol Davis, David Evelo, Christine Hurley, Ruth Katz, Melissa Kau, Darnell
Logan, Kathy Robison, Martha Thurlow and Deborah Westberry