1.  Brief description of program or practice:

A system of care in Clark County - it is led by a for-profit behavioral health company.  It is one of the better efforts for children and families in the U.S. Community Collaborative.

2.  Focus of program/practice. Which of the following are involved in implementing the program or practice? (Please list all that apply.)

All

Agencies (e.g., schools, counselors, county mental health)

Organizations (e.g., family organization)

Natural supports (e.g., extended family):

An organization of parents have come together to support wrap around.

Individual providers (public or private, e.g., clinicians)

Funding sources (e.g., IDEA, Medicaid):

For-profit behavioral health company

 

3.  How long has the promising program or practice been in operation? 

3 years

4.  Degree of implementation and degree of institutionalization. Please indicate below the extent to which the program or practice has been implemented (i.e., Pervasiveness/penetration of the program or practice) and institutionalized (i.e., internalized/routinized use of program or practice).

5.  What are the salient values, philosophies, principles, beliefs, or assumptions underlying the program or practice?

CASSP value and Wrap Around Values

6.  What are the key features of the program or practice that make it promising?

1. Unusual degree of cross-agency collaboration
2. Child welfare has brought the wrap-around model more

7.  What contextual factors (i.e., environment in which the program or practice operates) appear to be necessary for its successful operation?

It is run by a behavioral health company.

Which of the following principles underlying the National Agenda for Achieving Better Results for Children and Youth With Serious Emotional Disturbance, effective wraparound models, and systems of care, does the program or practice encompass? (Please check all that apply.)